Base isolator hysteresis
Digitized force–displacement loops at four strain levels; per‑bearing storage stiffness \(K_1\), loss stiffness \(K_2\), equivalent viscous damping ratio \(\zeta_{\mathrm{eff}}\), and energy per cycle; trend plots vs strain.
This page presents portfolio work from CE223 – Earthquake Protective Systems: linear multi‑degree‑of‑freedom (MDOF) time‑history analysis and an earlier single‑degree‑of‑freedom (SDOF) base‑isolation project built from measured hysteresis, equivalent SDOF models, and time‑ and frequency‑domain response.
Terms used below: MDOF = multi‑degree‑of‑freedom; SDOF = single‑degree‑of‑freedom; HDR = high‑damping rubber; K₁ = storage stiffness, K₂ = loss stiffness (from hysteresis loops); ζeff = equivalent viscous damping ratio; RSA = response spectrum analysis; SRSS = square‑root‑of‑sum‑of‑squares (modal combination rule); FFT = fast Fourier transform; 2‑DOF = two‑degree‑of‑freedom.
The first set of dashboards documents a base‑isolation workflow using a single‑degree‑of‑freedom (SDOF) model built from measured hysteresis of high‑damping rubber (HDR) bearings. The workflow yields equivalent SDOF parameters—storage stiffness \(K_1\), loss stiffness \(K_2\), and equivalent viscous damping ratio \(\zeta_\mathrm{eff}\)—and uses fixed‑point iteration on strain and \(\zeta_\mathrm{eff}\), plus time‑ and frequency‑domain response.
What this project shows
Digitized force–displacement loops at four strain levels; per‑bearing storage stiffness \(K_1\), loss stiffness \(K_2\), equivalent viscous damping ratio \(\zeta_{\mathrm{eff}}\), and energy per cycle; trend plots vs strain.
Fixed‑point iteration with four bearings (system stiffness \(k = 4K_1\)); convergence of strain and \(\zeta_{\mathrm{eff}}\); Newmark time integration vs fast Fourier transform (FFT) under the Kobe University record, component 090.
Models A, B, C: force–displacement loops; storage and loss stiffness \(K_1(\omega)\), \(K_2(\omega)\) vs frequency; equivalent damping coefficient (EDC); frequency‑domain earthquake response.
Force–displacement loops only for damping models A, B, C.
A second project focuses on linear multi‑degree‑of‑freedom (MDOF) response: a Newmark time‑integration implementation in matrix form and its relationship to modal superposition and response spectrum analysis (RSA). It is illustrated on a two‑degree‑of‑freedom (2‑DOF) shear frame and then on a 2‑DOF base‑isolated building under the Kobe University record, component 090 (KBU090).
What this project shows
Two‑degree‑of‑freedom (2‑DOF) shear frame under a short sustained load; non‑classical damping; direct MDOF time history vs modal approximation.
Direct MDOF time history via Newmark; modal time history and response spectrum analysis (RSA) with square‑root‑of‑sum‑of‑squares (SRSS) modal combination; drift, isolator displacement, base shear coefficient.
Further background on dynamics, spectra, and numerical methods appears in the following course pages.